Hello, my fellow readers today I will be giving three reason why, the movie The Giver is better that the book. One reason why I think the movie is better than the book is that it shows a lot feeling, so does the book, why do I think that the movie is better than the book? My second reason why think the movie is better than the book is that the movie is in first person than third person, Why do I think 3rd person is bad? My last reason why I think the movie is better than the book is that the movie has more characters come into the plot such as the chief elder. What is wrong not having many characters in the book?
My first reason why I think the movie is better than the book is that the movie shows a lot feeling, so does the book.Why do I think that the movie is better than the book? First why I think the movie is better is that the movie is that you can watch the movie and it will take a couple of hours of your time, and you will understand the movie at the end, at the end of the book she leaves story with no ending. Another reason why I prefer the movie is that the movie gives more detail, but not with a rigmarole story it had short details of the five w's, who,what,when,where,why in minutes. With the book you have to read a long time just to get the five w's. My last reason why I think the movie is better than the book is that you get your exposition earlier than the book. According Meb Webster the exposition is setting forth the meaning and purpose. Why someone would disagree with my argument is that you know what mad and sad and other emotions feel like, so why would you want to see if know what emotions are. Well I don’t have to think I see with my eyes and then feel sorry or angry, every emotion that they make me feel. Only books make you imagine what emotions are, but see them changes how you really feel.
My second reason why I think the movie is better than the book is that the movie is in first person than 3rd. Why do I think 3rd person is bad? Well in third person saying every move of someone, so say if you walked forwards then stop all of sudden, well the writer would put (you) walked forwards then stopped all sudden. Wouldn't that get annoying, well in the movie it's in first person so that is better than 3rd, 1st person is basically saying what you thought at one moment in your past. One book that I know that was in first person was the outsiders, that is why I like the book, but the giver book I think I would pass on the book, but I still read the book. Next is that 3rd person is very hard to write and it takes super long because you are writing every move at every moment. I think that you not 3rd person, but someone would disagree with me because they like what the character is doing so they know what will happen next at every moment. Well, they my think that, but my reasoning is better because in the person’s you can see what happening instead of saying every move.
My last reason why I think the movie is better than the book is that the movie is there are more characters, What is wrong not having many characters in the book. Well there isn’t action for a long time in the book because their are no villains or characters in plot that make exposition go to rising action. With villains there are more emotion, action and make the plot make people want to watch the movie over and over. With characters in the movie it makes the plot more dramatic, but in the book you barely get any characters in the book and does not make you feel emotion like the movie. Lastly with characters in the movie it helps make audience remember a scene or the whole movie instead forgetting the book and the plot. Right now I have been using the book to remember the plot, but not movie because the movie made remember the plot.
Despite the changes in the giver movie the book does a good job because of how the author writing in such good detail. I would give the book a 5 star rating because it shows so much emotion, but I don't know what characters are feeling. The book is great, but not as great as the movie because of my three reason above the paragraph.
In conclusion I was trying to say the movie is better because of my three reason. Why do I like the movie than the book? Why do I think 3rd person is bad? What is wrong with having characters? Basicly I am saying I do not like the book because of the how it is written and not as much characters. You may disagree with all my reasoning, but I will always think what I think because The Giver has more to give than the book.